Reflections on the Constitutional Court’s Annulment Decision No. 2025/121 Regarding Mediation Applications with a Request for Reinstatement in Cases Involving Principal Employer – Subcontractor Relationships
Keywords:
Mandatory Mediation as a Prerequisite for Litigation in Labor Disputes, Principal – Subcontractor Relationship, Mediation Involving Claims for Reinstatement, Joint and Several Liability, Mandatory Joint LitigationAbstract
The introduction of mediation as a prerequisite for litigation in labor disputes has led to various practical and legal issues in cases involving claims for reinstatement where a principal – subcontractor relationship exists. Pursuant to Article 3/15 of the Labor Courts Law, in such disputes, for an agreement to be reached during the mediation phase, it was required that both employers participate in the negotiations together and express mutual consent. However, this requirement imposed a heavy burden on the employee and ran counter to the nature of mediation as an alternative and flexible method. The Constitutional Court, in its Decision No. 2025/121, annulled the relevant provision on the grounds that it restricted the employee’s right of access to the courts and violated the principle of proportionality...
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Banu Denizli Öztürk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In case an article is accepted for publication it is allowed to combine the article with other researches, to conduct a new research on the article or to make different arrangements on condition that the same license is used including the commercial purpose.
As an author of an article published in Journal of Ibn Haldun Studies you retain the copyright of your article and you are free to reproduce and disseminate your work.




