Comparison of Dispute Resolution through Conciliation and Mediation from the Perspective of International Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36657/ihcd.2025.133Keywords:
Conciliation, Mediation, Permanent Court of Arbitration, UNCITRAL, the Singapore ConventionAbstract
Among the non-judicial settlement mechanisms preferred for the settlement of disputes between the state and investors, there are two settlement methods that have close characteristics to each other. These are conciliation and mediation. In this article, firstly, the definition and application of conciliation and mediation, which emerged from public international law as peaceful remedies, are analysed. Subsequently, it is aimed to define these remedies, especially within the framework of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Commercial Conciliation and the Optional Conciliation Rules of the Permanent Court of International Arbitration, to reveal their differences from each other, to discuss the characteristics of these remedies and finally to discuss the enforceability of conciliation and mediation agreements in international disputes within the scope of the provisions of the Singapore Convention.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sezercan Bektaş

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In case an article is accepted for publication it is allowed to combine the article with other researches, to conduct a new research on the article or to make different arrangements on condition that the same license is used including the commercial purpose.
As an author of an article published in Journal of Ibn Haldun Studies you retain the copyright of your article and you are free to reproduce and disseminate your work.